Social relationships indeed are a major determinant of health, in turn influencing physical and mental health to a great extent (Umberson and Karas Montez, 2020). People with good social support have been found to be at lower risks of active non-communicable diseases, having a better immune system and longer expectancy of life. Whereas, on the other hand, social isolation and loneliness have always been interlinked with adverse outcomes in health, which comprises of heightened vulnerability to cardiovascular disease, higher rates of depression, and early mortality.

In today’s society, rapid urbanization, technological changes, and changing family structures all seem to have rewritten the way in which people interact with one another (Martino, Pegg and Frates, 2017). Digital connectivity provides new avenues of reaching out and maintaining contact, yet too often without depth or quality compared to face-to-face contact, exacerbating perceptions of loneliness. The COVID-19 pandemic brought this into real perspective, as mandated lockdowns and social distancing policies accelerated social isolation and underlined in harsh terms how protective relationships are for health (Schneiders, Mackworth-Young and Cheah, 2022).

There is increasing recognition of social relationships as one of the priorities in health concern amidst evolving public health concerns. The important development of health policies and interventions that foster meaningful social connections could be important in improving population health and taking on the rising tide of loneliness and isolation.

The Biological Mechanisms of Social Relationships

Physiological Effects: Immune System and Cardiovascular Health

Notably, social relationship quantity and quality have a quintessential physiological consequence, especially on immune function and cardiovascular health (Lauten, Natour and Case, 2024). According to studies, supportive relationships are considered apt to control the body’s response to stress. This, in turn, has an afterward positive effect on the working of the immune system. Positive social contacts lead to the secretion of oxytocin, also called the “bonding hormone,” which reduces stress and strengthens the immune system. Furthermore, it is seen that individuals with social support networks are found to produce higher antibody responses to vaccinations and to have greater resistance to infections. On the other hand, in the case of social isolation, a hyperactive stress response is solemnly induced. The resultant chronic inflammation and undermined immune defense have resulted in ever-increasing susceptibility to diseases like hypertension and autoimmune disorders.

The cardiovascular system also benefits greatly from social support. Indeed, research has documented that socially connected individuals have lower blood pressure and a reduced risk of cardiovascular problems. Conversely, low levels of social relationships are associated with higher blood pressure and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, including fatal or nonfatal strokes, where the cardiovascular effects of chronic social isolation bear some resemblance to major risk factors such as smoking and obesity.

Indeed, loneliness increases one’s risk for heart disease by 29 percent and stroke by 32 percent, as one study showed (Xia and Li, 2018). It is clear, therefore, that positive or negative social relationships have a strong relation to long-term cardiovascular health.

Psychological Theories: Maslow’s Hierarchy and Attachment Theory

These psychological theories may try to explain why such social relationships have become so fundamental to health and well-being.

Social relationships, according to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, fulfill the third level of human needs: belongingness and love. Once physiological and safety needs are satisfied, a further need for social belonging created in one’s self-esteem and way of actualizing becomes very important. Social relationships fulfill this need, wherein individuals feel valued, supported, and understood, all of which avail in creating emotional stability and strength. For example, people who report that they have relationships with close friends tend to show less anxiety and depression and are more likely to report higher life satisfaction (Bowen, 2021).

Attachment theory, suggested by psychologist John Bowlby, underlines how these early social bonds set the stage for later emotional health. A good attachment established during childhood provides a secure base from which one can develop appropriate mechanisms for coping with adverse conditions and regulating one’s emotions. One can easily predict that adults who have secure attachments with others are more likely to establish supportive relations whereas the one who has insecure attachment may differ in relationships and stand-alone that may result in loneliness and Lost health (MacBlain, 2021). For example, generally, adults with insecure childhood attachments show more social anxiety and more cortisol when they are confronted with social situations which could count toward chronic stress and result in health problems (Kidd, Hamer and Steptoe, 2013). These intertwined biological and psychological mechanisms now underscore how important social relationships serve in maintaining health, shaping responses to stress, connecting with others, and sustaining mental and physical well-being.

Health Benefits of Social Relationships

Physical Health: Implications for the Development of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer Survival

Social relationships are beneficial to physical health on the whole, in cardiovascular health, and in cancer survival. Various studies have underlined that participants with large-sized social support networks have considerably lower mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular disease. Supportive relationships reduce levels of stress, lower blood pressure, and improve heart functioning. Studies have shown that married individuals or those with a close, long-term relationship have up to a 12% lower risk of developing heart disease than single individuals or those without such relationships (American College of Cardiology, n.d.). Such an effect partially can be explained by buffering from emotional support, as stress has been widely accepted to be one of the major contributors to heart diseases.

Social ties also play a very important role in fostering improved survival rates from cancer. Research has documented that patients with advanced cancer who have more social support have higher survival rates and respond better to their treatment (Bou‐Samra et al., 2021). The presence of close friends and family may encourage patients to comply with treatment plans, come in for follow-up care, and to engage in health-promoting behaviors. For example, breast cancer patients who were more actively involved in their support groups reported a better quality of life and immune functioning than patients who were socially isolated. Although social support-especially-fosters resilience and optimism that are psychologically beneficial and possibly reduce inflammation markers linked to cancer progression, social relationships help buffer psychologically and facilitate health-enhancing behaviors crucial for cancer survival and recovery.

Mental Health: Its Role in Trying to Reduce Depression and Stress

Mental Health: Its Role in Trying to Reduce Depression PTSD Symptoms, and Stress Social connections play an equally protecting role in maintaining mental health, greatly reducing the risks of depression, PTSD, and stress (Jones, Mougouei and Evans, 2021). Quality relationships thus offer emotional support, validation, and a feeling of belonging-all protective factors for depression. For example, it has been shown that individuals with solid social networks are up to 50% less likely to develop depressive symptoms. Socialization helps individuals reframe negative thinking, enjoy activities, and stay involved with a purpose in life-all factors that are counter-depressive. For example, older adults who experience frequent family and friend contact have less depressive symptoms and greater happiness than do reclusive elderly people. This speaks to the importance of social connection with regard to maintaining mental health across the years. Quality in social relationships in PTSD serves as a shock-absorbing mechanism that allows the individual to work through traumatic experiences. Individuals suffering from the illness who are found to have more supportive relationships generally express lower levels of clinical symptoms-intrusive memories and hyperarousal-compared to others. The networks allow them a chance to talk through events and to be understood and listened to with empathy; this can help them feel less isolated and afraid.

The study shows that the veterans who are socially well-supported have a higher chance of positive change in psychological outlook after trauma, otherwise known as post-traumatic growth, rather than feelings of isolation. These findings will go toward the therapeutic power of social connections with regard to trauma recovery and strategies that reduce symptoms of PTSD.

Another important impact of social support is the fact that it significantly reduces levels of stress by providing practical and emotional assistance during times of need. When people have an assured and sure support network, they cope with the given stressors. Friends, family, and colleagues can offer perspective advice and direct help in problem solving, which makes the burden of stress lighter. A good example is that people who have supportive networks due to stress attributable to job loss generally report lower levels of stress and faster recovery.

The buffering hypothesis proposes that a given level of stress will have much less impact on individuals’ mental and physical health if they feel there are people to whom they can turn for support. It may even be taken onto a physiological level, whereby even the presence of support reduces cortisol levels-those becoming too high may lead to chronic health problems. The bottom line: social relationships powerfully affect both physical and mental health. By acting on heart disease, cancer survival, depression, PTSD, and stress management-in all these ways-supportive relationships act protectively against a wide array of health risks. These examples point to the broad-based benefits of social connection, underlining their association not just with quality of life but with the length of life itself (Jones, Mougouei and Evans, 2021).

Consequences of Social Isolation

Comparison with Other Health Risks: Smoking, Obesity

Social isolation and loneliness are increasingly viewed as major health risks, with some studies suggesting their impact on physical health may be just as profound as that of well-recognized risks such as smoking and obesity. For instance, studies have documented that long-term social isolation is associated with a 29% heightened risk of premature death, a number comparable to the mortality risk from smoking 15 cigarettes a day. Like smoking, social isolation can foster high blood pressure, inflammation, and the development of chronic conditions such as heart disease. Similar to the parallel consequences of social isolation, obesity is also attributed to increased inflammation and susceptibility to a wide array of health issues (Xia and Li, 2018b).

Both social isolation and obesity tend to put individuals at health risks by engaging them in activities that further deteriorate their health conditions. The isolated individual can be more inclined towards resigning themselves to sedentary life, eating poorly, and not seeing their physician regularly, all factors that worsen physical and mental problems. Further, loneliness can weaken the body’s immune system and leave an open door to disease. For example, researchers have documented that people with large social networks are less likely to develop a cold or other viral infections than averaging and poorly connected individuals, protection that the socially isolated do not enjoy. Such comparisons underscore the point that social isolation is an imposing physiological risk factor, one not limited to only being a psychological problem, but in fact ranking with many best-acknowledged health hazards.

Loneliness and Mortality Rates: A Critical Review

Loneliness largely features alongside social isolation and, on the whole, has very serious ramifications in terms of mortality rates. Large numbers of studies have, in fact, found chronic loneliness to be associated with increased mortality risks, which often rests at a level comparable to those of more established physical health hazards. A meta-analysis of several studies found that loneliness increases the risk of early death by about 26%, highlighting the magnitude of this issue (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015).

This increased risk of mortality is in part a function of how loneliness acts to affect stress and, subsequently, cardiovascular health. Indeed, prolonged states of loneliness are associated with increased levels of cortisol-a stress hormone that, at chronically elevated levels, contributes to high blood pressure, inflammation, and other cardiovascular conditions that increase mortality risk.

The influence of loneliness on mortality goes beyond cardiovascular health, as it has also been associated with increased risks of dementia and neurodegenerative conditions. Loneliness seems to hasten the decline in cognitive performance, likely because of the lack of mental challenge and social interaction to stimulate and support cognitive function. For example, studies of older adults under conditions of social isolation have reported accelerated declines in cognitive function, as well as increased susceptibility to illness, including Alzheimer’s disease, making loneliness a significant public health concern in older age. Loneliness has also contributed to other mental conditions such as depression and anxiety, which indirectly contribute to mortality. Such mental health problems may further lead to self-neglect, substance abuse, and suicide, which are all adding up to rates of untimely death.

A kind of snowball effect seems to appear between loneliness and mental health problems, inasmuch as loneliness heightens levels of mental health, which in turn heighten levels of loneliness and therefore further exacerbate physical health and life span. Therefore, the review of loneliness consequences will manifestly reveal that health risks due to social isolation are widespread and serious: loneliness increases mortality rates but decreases quality because it accelerates cognitive decline and contributes to mental health problems. Therefore, policy interventions, community initiatives, and mental health support for addressing social isolation may be necessary for mitigating such serious health risks and ensuring healthy longevity across the populations.

Social Support as Preventative Medicine

Case Studies of “Connection Prescription” Practices

A “Connection Prescription” is one way a conceptual model can be using social support to prevent health decline by directly reducing the isolation risk factor. Programs that do just this, that being integration of social connections into care, include the UK’s “Social Prescribing” initiative (Reinhardt, Vidovic and Hammerton, 2021).

Participants in this program, which serves individuals with chronic health conditions or mental health problems, receive “prescriptions” for community activities  that are encouraging interaction and lessening loneliness. Researchers described improved mental well-being for participants-studies of the participants have reproduced findings of reduced GP visits and improved overall health outcomes-suggesting that promoting social interaction may divorce symptoms related to both mental and physical health conditions.

Similarly, “Connection Prescription” practices have been put in place by some U.S. healthcare providers in major primary care settings. Physicians refer their patients to activities that nurture social bonding through club memberships, volunteer work, and the like. These programs have been particularly efficient among older adults, where loneliness and related isolation are more current features. The outcomes from these initiatives have shown reductions in anxiety, depression, and chronic pain, again pinpointing that social support is indeed another strong, non-pharmacological intervention.

Role in Lifestyle Medicine and Health Interventions

Social support forms a very important part of lifestyle medicine, which is preventive and holistic. Indeed, social connection has recently emerged as a critical component of lifestyle intervention. For instance, behavioral modification programs for various diseases like obesity, diabetes, or heart disease have group-based efforts where support among peers motivates participants by enhancing their adherence to prescribed healthy behaviors. This approach benefits not just in better individual outcomes but also leads to sustained lifestyle changes. The practice of social prescription and support interventions for the meeting of social needs in health shows how relational nurturing between people can act as powerful, preventive medicine. Both processes suggest that community ties should be at the heart of public health strategies and approaches to healthcare in dealing with chronic diseases and psychological health.

Impact of Modern Society on Social Relationships

Digital Communication versus Face-to-Face Interaction

Social relationships in contemporary times are actually technologically mediated; thus, the very nature of human connectedness has changed. To be sure, digital communication is convenient and can even bridge distances, yet so much of it is devoid of the depth and emotional richness that face-to-face interaction provides. And at times, such virtual communication can only lead to a superficial connect in which one misses the non-verbal hints and substantial engagement at levels quite necessary to foster an atmosphere of trust and empathy. Other studies found that digital dependence, such as in the case of excessive use of social media, may result in an increased feeling of loneliness despite a growing quantity of social contacts. This may therefore form a paradox in which the advance in technology potentially thwarts the development of genuinely supportive relationships.

Urbanization and Changing Family Structure

Changes in family structure and urbanization have also transformed social relationships, and more often than not, a sense of disconnection. Apart from urbanization, people may be living in areas of high population but solitude due to rapid lifestyles, reduced personal contacts, and increased single-person households. Secondly, conventional family structures are changing, even more so within the persons who live alone or non-traditionally, hence reducing the support derived from closely related families (Hussain, 2023).

These changes in society have resulted in many of today’s individuals relying more on friendships and external networks for support, which may not be as reliable or emotionally as deep or have the depth provided by family connections. While modern society offers new ways to connect, it brings with it serious challenges in making and maintaining meaningful relationships, thus underlining the need for conscious efforts towards evolving genuine social bonding.

Conclusion

In sum, social relationships bear much importance, not only in terms of mental and emotional health but also physical health, as they strongly affect life expectancy and quality. Since our world is being increasingly set up for digital and urban living, authentic deep contacts have been progressively hard to uphold, which is a reason that makes it even more necessary that social health be made part of public health concerns. Policies that encourage community building and social prescribing, along with balanced digital interactions, can go a long way in mitigating adverse health effects related to loneliness and social isolation. It is for this reason that policy recognition of social support as preventive medicine-especially for mental and chronic health conditions-becomes quite instrumental toward future public health strategies. Indeed, generating healthy social networks at the community level provides a long-term and holistic solution to general health and longevity.

References

American College of Cardiology. (n.d.). Marriage Linked to Lower Heart Risks in Study of 3.5+ Million Adults. [online] Available at: https://www.acc.org/about-acc/press-releases/2014/03/28/09/55/alviar-marital-status.

Bou‐Samra, P., Scott, P., Cheng, H., Kallem, C., Pathak, R., Geller, D.A., Marsh, W., Wang, Y., Antoni, M., Penedo, F.J., Tsung, A. and Steel, J.L. (2021). Social Support is Associated with Survival in Patients Diagnosed with Gastrointestinal Cancer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 53(4), pp.854–861. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-021-00741-8.

Bowen, B. (2021). The matrix of needs: reframing Maslow’s hierarchy. Health, [online] 13(05), pp.538–563. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2021.135041.

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T., Baker, M., Harris, T. and Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: a Meta-Analytic Review. [online] Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25910392/.

Hussain, M. (2023). Urbanization and Its Effects on Social Structures: A Social Science Inquiry. Physical Education, Health and Social Sciences, [online] 1(4), pp.31–40. Available at: http://journal-of-social-education.org/index.php/Jorunal/article/view/46 [Accessed 17 Nov. 2024].

Jones, R., Mougouei, D. and Evans, S.L. (2021). Understanding the emotional response to Covid‐19 information in news and social media: A mental health perspective. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(5). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.304.

Kidd, T., Hamer, M. and Steptoe, A. (2013). Adult attachment style and cortisol responses across the day in older adults. Psychophysiology, 50(9), pp.841–847. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12075.

Lauten, T.H., Natour, T. and Case, A.J. (2024). Innate and adaptive immune system consequences of post-traumatic stress disorder. Autonomic Neuroscience, 252, pp.103159–103159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2024.103159.

MacBlain, S. (2021). Learning Theories for Early Years Practice. www.torrossa.com, [online] pp.1–100. Available at: https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5282231&publisher=FZ7200#page=87.

Martino, J., Pegg, J. and Frates, E.P. (2017). The Connection Prescription: Using the Power of Social Interactions and the Deep Desire for Connectedness to Empower Health and Wellness. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, [online] 11(6), pp.466–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827615608788.

Reinhardt, G., Vidovic, D. and Hammerton, C. (2021). Understanding loneliness: a systematic review of the impact of social prescribing initiatives on loneliness. Perspectives in Public Health, [online] 141(4), pp.204–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913920967040.

Schneiders, M.L., Mackworth-Young, C.R.S. and Cheah, P.Y. (2022). Between division and connection: a qualitative study of the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on social relationships in the United Kingdom. Wellcome Open Research, 7, p.6. doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17452.1.

Umberson, D. and Karas Montez, J. (2020). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, [online] 51(1), pp.54–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383501.

Xia, N. and Li, H. (2018a). Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Cardiovascular Health. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, [online] 28(9), pp.837–851. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2017.7312.

Xia, N. and Li, H. (2018b). Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Cardiovascular Health. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, [online] 28(9), pp.837–851. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2017.7312.

Disclaimer:

At Medikiaa Health Publishing, we offer our readers access to a collection of archived materials. Please be sure to check the date of the last review or update for each article. Remember, the information on this site, no matter how recent, should never replace the personalized medical advice from your doctor or another qualified healthcare professional.

At its core, positive psychology is a relatively modern branch of psychology that redirects the scientific study of mental illness and dysfunction toward the investigation of human strengths, virtues, and high functioning. Introduced formally in the late 1990s by Martin Seligman, positive psychology seeks to attain an understanding of what allows individuals and societies to flourish rather than merely exist (Seligman, 2011). Emphasizing well-being, resilience, and the creation and living of a meaningful life, it acts as a balancing force for traditional psychology’s commitments to pathology.

Living in a time when stress, trauma, and mental health difficulties are central topics of conversation, the lessons of positive psychology couldn’t be more timely. It speaks directly to questions such as: How can people be happy? How can people have better relationships? And how can one achieve a sense of purpose? It puts a positive and proactive lens on mental health. For example, rather than diagnosing and treating anxiety, positive psychology would really try to understand how practices of gratitude or mindfulness would be able to potentially dampen anxiety and improve general well-being.

Yet, not everyone is a fan of the field. Some feel positive psychology simplifies experiences that are essentially complex, embracing positivity rather than the validation and working through of negative ones. Others also criticize its perceived Western-centric bias, questioning whether the dynamics behind its principles apply universally across cultures (van Zyl et al., 2023). This critique highlights the need for balance and nuance regarding positive psychology-to embrace its promise but be informed about its limitations as well.

This present paper represents the basic conceptual framework on which positive psychology is based, the practical trends of its use, and the problems it faces. To understand the potential of this burgeoning field, it is necessary to consider both strengths and shortcomings. By so doing, a better understanding will be gained of the role at play in nurturing the well-being of individuals and society as a whole. In fact, the potential of positive psychology consists not of replacing traditional views on mental health but of supplementing them and allowing a more rounded view of what it is to live a worthwhile and meaningful life.

Elaborated Core Concepts of Positive Psychology

Happiness and Well-being

The concept of happiness, in positive psychology, is essentially linked to a two-factor theory: hedonic well-being and eudaimonic well-being. Hedonic well-being speaks of the pursuit of pleasure while avoiding pain, whereas immediate gratification and emotional satisfaction play an important role. Eudaimonic well-being can be termed as the pursuit of purpose, self-actualization, and living in congruence with one’s core values. These dimensions, taken together, provide a comprehensive framework for understanding what it is to live a fulfilling life (Ryan and Deci, 2001).

Positive psychology has so far introduced a number of theoretical frameworks that operationalize these concepts, among which the model proposed by Martin Seligman is especially outstanding. In turn, the PERMA model tends to the five elements that define long-term well-being: Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment (University of Pennsylvania , 2013).

For example, Positive Emotion represents the capability to relish and build on positive experiences; full involvement in activities deploying one’s strengths defines Engagement. Relationships draw on the value of social connections; Meaning concerns a sense of purpose, while Accomplishment focuses on attainment regarding goals laid down by the individual (Chandran, V. Vijayalakshmi and Fiedler, 2024). As it is widely applied, this model has become very popular in educational institutions and workplace programs for a foundation on wellbeing promotion. Despite such popularity, critiques to the PERMA feature a Western-centric bias in most of its components, especially Accomplishment, because it did focus on individualistic achievement. Most cultures are collectivist in nature; hence, such an emphasis on personal accomplishment may feel out of place. For instance, in countries like Japan or India, communal harmony and interdependence are held to be much above personal success, which questions the universality of PERMA as a framing of happiness.

Further more, the discussion about happiness itself raised much controversy. Though the representatives of positive psychology included the pursuit of happiness in the list of major objectives, critics believe well-being should not be reduced just to the presence of positive emotions. Because they claim, happiness is a fleeting feeling and may become counterproductive if relentlessly pursued. That’s sideline in the case of toxic positivity if people are pressured to appear happy even when bad things happen to them.

For instance, a person who has lost a loved one may be advised to “look on the bright side” or cultivate gratitude instead, which does minimize emotional hurt and, by so doing, delays the process of healing (www.proquest.com, n.d.). All negative emotions-in which are included those attendant to grieving, nearing anger, or frustration, for example-are an uncomfortable yet understandable part of personal development and resilience. They are laden with salient lessons to be used for long-term well-being. Added to this is the issue of culture and socioeconomic status, further complicating such matters of happiness. Circumstances of scarce resources, for example, include people who may settle for survival rather than the pursuit of positive emotions and hence would be less relevantly targeted by an intervention focused on happiness. The emphasis on happiness, therefore, although offering valuable insights through positive psychology, needs to approach the matter in a nuanced way, present it with cultural diversity, and appreciate the full spectrum of human experiences.

Strengths and Virtues

Another imperative focus of positive psychology is identifying and developing strengths and virtues. This evolves from the belief that tapping into one’s inner character can yield progress both personally and professionally. Tools developed for the identification and fostering of these strengths include the VIA Classification of Character Strengths by Martin Seligman and Christopher Peterson (Proquest.com, 2022). The VIA encompasses 24 universally valued strengths, grouped into the six core virtues of wisdom, courage, humanity, justice, temperance, and transcendence. Examples of those strengths include creativity, bravery, kindness, fairness, humility, and gratitude.

In recent years, strength-based approaches have received great appreciation, starting from education and finishing with organizational leadership. For instance, people identifying and using their strengths are likely to exhibit increased levels of self-efficacy, satisfaction, and productivity (Farmer, Xu and Dupre, 2021).

Application of strengths-based intervention in workplaces has enhanced employee engagement and improved performance in teams. Employees who receive recognition for their unique talents are quicker to feel valued and motivated, ensuring a positive feedback loop that enriches the individual and the organization.

However, the strength-based approach does not come without its drawbacks. Some critics argue that this heavy investment in strengths is exactly what takes away from the desire to work on one’s weaknesses or develop new skills. An example here is how a student with strong marks in analytical thinking and low in emotional intelligence loses an opportunity for growth over the course of education that overemphasizes his strengths (Ye Shengyao et al., 2024).

Similarly, in professional contexts, an employee’s obsession with their strengths may hinder the same employee from working on lacunas, which is paramount for wholesome progress and harmony.

Further, the universality of the VIA has also been questioned. Although the developers of the VIA argue that the strengths are universally valued, transcending cultural and contextual influences, the desirability and expression of the strengths bear the imprint of these influences (www.viacharacter.org, n.d.). For instance, virtues like humility and teamwork may be highly extolled in collectivist orientations, while strengths that reflect individualistic dispositions, such as bravery or acts of creativity, may not receive as much emphasis.

This bears consequences on the generalization of strengths-based interventions across diverse cultural contexts and on culturally sensitive modifications. The focus on strengths also runs the risk of simplifying the intricacies in human behaviors. Humans are dynamic and complex, and their strengths will similarly manifest differently at different times under differing circumstances. For example, persistence-a generally considered virtue-can easily become destructive when it leads to burnout or prevents someone from reassessing an unrealistic goal. This again brings into focus the need for a balanced approach that takes into consideration both the potential of character strengths and the limitations.

Flow and Engagement

The concept of flow, elaborated upon by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, is a development of positive psychology. Flow can be defined as knowledge that one is utterly immersed in an activity, during which time expires unnoticed; thus, it is an example of undisturbed participation. Flow may be associated with the development of creativity, productivity, and personal satisfaction-a valuable part of well-being (Google Books, 2024).

Flow occurs when the following three conditions are met: when there are clear goals about the activity, when there is immediate feedback about how the activity is going, and when there is a balance between the activity’s challenge and the individual skill. A completely absorbed artist painting, or a software developer working through a difficult coding problem, may reach a flow state and become even more focused and intrinsically motivated. Those who often experience flow in personal or professional activities report generally being happier and more satisfied. However, despite its value, flow is not universally accessible (Janssens and Zaytsev, 2022).

Critics argue that the preconditions of flow-clear goals, immediate feedback, and a balance of skill and challenge-are always dependent upon external factors such as socioeconomic status, education, and workplace environment. For example, individuals within low-resource environments may not have access to the various tools or opportunities that offer them activities which could induce flow. Again, jobs that are high in stress and rigid in structure may suppress creativity and autonomy needed to achieve a flow condition. The second issue is that an excessive orientation toward flow will produce certain effects that are negative in nature. In the case of some individuals, searching for flow may be accompanied by the neglect of other life spheres that are no less important, like relationships or physical health. As such, a professional fully engaged in work can forget about the family or good health (Oppland, 2016).

It means that a certain balance is needed to make sure flow does not decrease but increases general well-being. Again, the centrality given to flow as a measure of engagement tends to neglect the many ways in which people find significant meanings and satisfactions in their lives. While for some, high-intensity, goal-oriented situations may be all that bring out the best in them, others would find such an atmosphere oppressive and engage themselves meaningfully in less structured activities, such as caregiving or leisurely engagements. This implicit recognition of the diverse forms of engagement underlines the need to respect and appreciate such diversity rather than propose a single model. This suggests that flow is at least in practice a potent concept concerning the potential level of engrossment and intrinsic motivation but also encourages the need for careful attention to individual and contextual factors. It is only by recognizing and embracing such complexities that positive psychology about well-being is enhanced to address, in a better way, the diverse needs and experiences of individuals, hence advancing an inclusive and holistic understanding of well-being.

Use of positive psychology at day-to-day life

Education

Up until today, positive psychology has made strong incursions into education, proposing instruments and models aimed at the well-being and resilience of students. Positive education brings together traditional academic learning and well-being principles, such as developing gratitude, fostering emotional intelligence, and teaching resilience. The objective is not only to favor academic performance but rather to provide students with the ability to face the difficulties of life (Ala, Ramos-Campos and Inês Carvalho Relva, 2024).

One example is that one of the schools in Australia introduced a positive education program based on gratitude journaling and resilience-building exercises; students showed improvement in emotional well-being and better interpersonal relationships. Academic performance also slightly rose, believed to be the result of reduced anxiety and better focus.

But critics say positive psychology tends to reduce complex issues within education about mental health problems to a “one-size-fits-all” approach. Where gratitude exercises may help some students, they can sometimes feel ineffective or deny those young people who are facing other systemic issues such as poverty or dysfunctional family life. For positive education not to be a frivolous panacea, interventions would have to be tailored to the needs of different students in an economic and cultural variety of settings.

In the Workplace

The principles of positive psychology have changed everything in organizations today by underlining that employees need to be approached in terms of their wellness-a gateway to productivity and organizational success. Among these strategies, strengthening approaches, mindfulness practices, and enacting meaningful work are included. On the basis of positive psychology, for instance, Google has used a program in mindfulness and even done team-building workouts, thereby creating higher employee engagement and lower burnout among the employees.

Positive organizational behavior also tends to focus on meaningful work: Workers whose jobs are framed as connected to a greater good show higher job satisfaction and lower levels of stress. Strengths performance reviews, where managers use time with employees discussing their strengths rather than deficiencies, have been shown to build morale and productivity (Gordon, n.d.).

Yet, not everyone is a fan of the application of positive psychology to the workplace. An overemphasis on individual well-being can shift the burden of managing stress away from organizations and onto employees. For example, if an organization has a stressed worker, it would suggest practicing mindfulness rather than attacking root causes such as unrealistic deadlines set or poor leadership. This critique underlines the desirability of organizational accountability alongside individual interventions.

In Therapy and Mental Health

Recently, the inclusion of the concept of positive psychology in therapy has grown. It proposes tools that can augment more traditional methodologies. This consists of gratitude journaling, mindfulness exercises, and a focus on client strengths are some of the interventions that increase resilience and general well-being. Many depressed patients, for example, learn about the use of gratitude to focus them from negative experiences to positive aspects of life.

However, there are those who caution against the simplification of mental health struggles through positive psychology interventions alone. Severe disorders, such as clinical depression or PTSD, are very complex and need to be treated therapeutically with much more nuance, often being intensive. The proposal that either of these states, gratitude or optimism, independently can alleviate such a condition is rather risky, as this would invalidate the lived experience of those living with complex mental health issues (Google Books, 2022).

Building on that, there is even the risk of encouraging poisonous positivity-a culture that suppresses negative emotions for the sake of enforced optimism. This alienates people who might need to process grief or anger or sadness-often natural and necessary feelings-in a safe space.

Personal Life

Some of the positive psychological principles involved in personal development entail fostering optimism, gratitude, and relationship building. Gratitude journaling and setting daily intentions for happiness have proved to enhance emotional well-being and offer a more positive outlook on life. People who habitually practice gratitude generally show more satisfaction and better social relationships.

But not all of those interventions are created equal. Katz (2022) argue that gratitude exercises might have positive outcomes in the short term but do little to address deeper issues, such as financial insecurity or structural discrimination. The simplification of its concepts via self-help books and online courses popularizing the discipline has also led to a watered-down version of positive psychology.

Sometimes, people get compelled to keep up with these practices and, when the results do not turn out as expected right away, feelings of guilt or frustration arise. In order to build a more impactful practice of positive psychology in life, one needs to set it within the wider context of individual life events and social realities.

Challenges/Critiques of Positive Psychology

Overemphasizing Positivity

Perhaps the most cogent criticism against positive psychology is that, at some point, the promotion of positivity, if taken to an extreme, can dissuade people from facing their negative emotions fully. This is often referred to as “toxic positivity”-when the struggles of people are dismissed and put under pressure to always “look on the bright side.” For example, those grieving losses or recovering from trauma may feel excluded by messages encouraging them to cultivate gratitude practices rather than process hurt.

In the foundational tenet of positive psychology, there is a potential downplaying of the importance of negative experiences. Supporters of the approach argue that resilience does not necessarily come from positive reinforcement alone but also from battling adversity and his client’s failures. This calls for a balanced approach to bring out both ends of the human emotional spectrum.

Cultural Limitations

These criticisms of positive psychology point particularly to the fact that it is primarily a Western-centric theory, focused on personal attainment and happiness. In these collectivist cultures, in which the well-being of the group or family supersedes individual self-interests, the theories of positive psychology appear incongruent or sometimes even irrelevant. For example, the focus on personal achievement found within the PERMA model may be incongruent with cultural expectations seeking group cohesion over the success of the individual.

Besides, the very concept of happiness and well-being is cross-culturally relative. While Western thought may align happiness with the concept of pleasure and individual liberty, the Eastern conceptual frameworks would focus more on contentment and balance, or spiritual growth. This suggests that modifications in positive psychology should be culturally sensitive to allow it to become relevant and applied globally.

Scientific Validity and Measurement

Oman (2021) have questioned the scientific rigor of positive psychology studies. Most such studies fall back on subjective self-reports for the measurement of happiness and well-being, which may be vulnerable to biases and social desirability. Another scientific credibility criterion is replicability, and that has been a bit of an Achilles’ heel in the field of positive psychology; some findings have not always held up when tested repeatedly.

For example, while gratitude interventions have shown promising results in short-term studies, their long-term efficacy remains uncertain. Without robust longitudinal research, the sustainability of positive psychology’s interventions remains an open question.

Ethics Consideration

Commercialization of positive psychology has also generated ethical concerns about its exploitation in self-help industries (Rimke, 2020). Motivational speakers and life coaches often dilute and sometimes distort the basic ideas by promising simplistic solutions when the beginnings of some problems go much deeper. Not only does this diminish credibility within the field itself, but it opens any number of avenues for exploitation where money is being invested into treatments that have no real accountability.

Further, critics point to the danger of further individualizing the pursuit of happiness at the expense of considering broader systemic issues of inequity or exploitation in the workplace. In framing well-being as a matter of individual effort, positive psychology diverts attention away from the kinds of social changes required to minimize root causes of stress and unhappiness.

The Future of Positive Psychology

Advances in neuroscience and technology shape the future of positive psychology. While, on one hand, positive neuroscience explores how structures and functions of the brain contribute toward a lifestyle of wellness, on the other, positive technology uses apps and digital platforms for enhancing mindfulness and resilience (Yaden, Eichstaedt and Medaglia, 2018). Guided meditation on mobile phone apps-like Headspace-is based on the very cornerstone of positive psychology and has made such practices more accessible. It also raises questions about data privacy, increased digital dependency, and over-commercialization, for which ethical guidelines must be laid down during the development itself. Integrating Positive Psychology with Other Disciplines 150 words Interdisciplinary collaboration goes a long way in further growth. Merging with traditional psychology, sociology, and health sciences allows deeper understandings of well-being. A good example is that if one incorporates knowledge of behavioral economics, it will give ways to design policies that help people make better choices toward healthier living.

Conclusion

Until very recently, positive psychology has emerged as an innovative approach that redirects the emphasis from rectifying deficits to nurturing strengths, resilience, and meaningful living. Complementing traditional psychologies, which center on what goes wrong in life, it points out what allows individuals and communities to thrive, providing a more comprehensive perspective on mental health and well-being. Yet, its various critiques—cultural biases through to simplification of complex issues—highlight the careful application of the approach and continued need for refinement. Positive psychology shall be inclusive, scientifically rigorous, and ethically accountable if it is to realize its full potential. A balanced perspective can allow this discipline to pave the way for a healthier and more flourishing world for everyone.

References

Ala, S., Ramos-Campos, F. and Inês Carvalho Relva (2024). Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress and Mental Health in a Sample of University Students: The Mediating Role of Resilience and Psychological Well-Being. European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education, 14(8), pp.2262–2281. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14080151.

Chandran, S., V. Vijayalakshmi and Fiedler, M. (2024). How Passion for Work Shapes Work-Family Interactions: A Conceptual Framework Exploring the Roles of Psychological Capital and Self-Regulation Failure. Human Resource Development Review. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843241249219.

Farmer, H., Xu, H. and Dupre, M.E. (2021). Self-Efficacy. Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging, pp.4410–4413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22009-9_1092.

Google Books. (2022). Brain Energy. [online] Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GIxlEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=clinical+depression+or+PTSD [Accessed 25 Nov. 2024].

Google Books. (2024). Flow 2.0. [online] Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=qREuEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR8&dq=The+concept+of+flow [Accessed 25 Nov. 2024].

Gordon, F. (n.d.). The Impact of Work-Based Mindfulness Programmes on Employee Health. [online] Available at: https://norma.ncirl.ie/4794/1/francesgordon.pdf [Accessed 25 Nov. 2024].

Janssens, S. and Zaytsev, V. (2022). Go with the flow. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3550356.3559101.

Katz, D.L. (2022). Don’t Judge a Book by Its Cover: A Case Study and Comparative Analysis of Popular vs. Academic Psychology Books. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 36(2), pp.233–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.31275/20222463.

Oman, S. (2021). Discovering ‘the New Science of Happiness’ and Subjective Well-being. New Directions in Cultural Policy Research, pp.119–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72937-0_4.

Oppland, M. (2016). 8 ways to create flow according to Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. [online] PositivePsychology.com. Available at: https://positivepsychology.com/mihaly-csikszentmihalyi-father-of-flow/.

Proquest.com. (2022). Examining Character Strength Differences Among United States Air Force Officers – ProQuest. [online] Available at: https://search.proquest.com/openview/7468f6fa3b8079010a53e991a858c3ba/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y [Accessed 25 Nov. 2024].

Rimke, H. (2020). Self-help, therapeutic industries, and neoliberalism. Routledge eBooks, pp.37–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429024764-5.

Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. [online] ResearchGate. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12181660_On_Happiness_and_Human_Potentials_A_Review_of_Research_on_Hedonic_and_Eudaimonic_Well-Being.

Seligman, M. (2011). Martin Seligman on Psychology. [online] Pursuit-of-happiness.org. Available at: https://www.pursuit-of-happiness.org/history-of-happiness/martin-seligman-psychology/.

University of Pennsylvania (2013). PERMA^TM Theory of Well-Being and PERMA^TM Workshops | Positive Psychology Center. [online] Upenn.edu. Available at: https://ppc.sas.upenn.edu/learn-more/perma-theory-well-being-and-perma-workshops.

van Zyl, L.E., Gaffaney, J., van der Vaart, L., Dik, B.J. and Donaldson, S.I. (2023). The critiques and criticisms of positive psychology: A systematic review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, [online] 19(2), pp.1–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2178956.

www.proquest.com. (n.d.). Transformative Trajectories: Creating Growth after Homicide – ProQuest. [online] Available at: https://search.proquest.com/openview/9aecdcb29d44ef98890e6e7120e3e7b3/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y.

www.viacharacter.org. (n.d.). Character Strengths, Character Building Experts | VIA Institute. [online] Available at: https://www.viacharacter.org/researchers/assessments/via-is.

Yaden, D.B., Eichstaedt, J.C. and Medaglia, J.D. (2018). The Future of Technology in Positive Psychology: Methodological Advances in the Science of Well-Being. Frontiers in psychology, [online] 9, p.962. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00962.

Ye Shengyao, Xuefen, L., Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi, Samsudin, N., Ke Chunchun and Ishak, Z. (2024). Emotional intelligence impact on academic achievement and psychological well-being among university students: the mediating role of positive psychological characteristics. BMC Psychology, 12(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01886-4.

Introduction: What is Stress?

Stress is a universal experience; it has a way of touching everybody’s life at one point or another. Even though it is universal in its incidence, the particular aspects that because individual stress vary enormously and depend upon a host of personal and circumstantial factors that pertain to that individual (Budziszewska, Babiuch-Hall and Wielebska, 2020). It can be a driving force; it motivates and develops growth and improves performance-a phenomenon termed eustress. On the other hand, when extreme and injurious, it can become overwhelming and destructive and is termed distress. Distress adversely affects mental, emotional, and physical health.

Figure 1 What is Stress?

Basically, stress encompasses an organism’s response to demands, whether in the form of external pressures or internal conflicts. It evokes physiological changes-typically the release of cortisol-designed to facilitate human beings responding effectively to challenges (Knezevic et al., 2023). All too often, prolonged or extreme stress disrupts this natural process and leads to severe health complications.

In a world of fast-paced living with high societal expectations, dependencies on technology, and blurred boundaries between work and life, stress has become omnipresent. The article aims to outline various aspects of stress, its effects on health, and practical ways of building resilience. First, the paper defines what stress is and then goes ahead to outline the different kinds of stress. Needless to say, understanding the many faces of stress forms the basis necessary to create varied solutions that allow individuals and communities to thrive.

The Multifaceted Nature of Stress

Stress is a complicated, multi-dimensional phenomenon that varies from person to person and situation to situation. It is not a uniform state of emotion, and the nature, its stimulators, and impact vary greatly with the type and context in which it occurs (Epel et al., 2018). Such varied conceptions of stress are best understood by first explaining its two main types-acutely and chronically-and critically assessing various triggers that characterize modern life.

Types of Stress

Acute Stress: Its Immediate Effects and Evolutionary Function

Acute stress is the response one has when a particular event or situation is perceived as threatening or challenging. This mode of stress is deeply embedded in our ancestry and was developed as part of a survival mechanism. The stress initiates the body’s “fight or flight” response and secretes hormones such as adrenaline and cortisol into the bloodstream, increasing alertness, heart rate, and mobilizing energy. It resolves when the threat or challenge has moved (Dhabhar, 2018).

Take the event of public speaking. As he approaches on stage, a flow of nervous energy courses through him, his breathing quickens, and alertness rises. These physiological changes become really uncomfortable but improve performance by making the speaker alert and attentive. Thus, acute stress also plays a constructive role in competitive sports or during emergency events where decisions need to be acted upon promptly with physical preparedness.

Acute stress becomes problematic when it occurs too frequently or when more than any one person can handle. For instance, if a person has many high-stakes situations on the same day-say, a firefighter dealing with multiple emergencies-the person just cannot recover well enough between episodes, and cumulative effects of stress begin to build up (Milen, n.d.).

Chronic Stress: How It Builds Up Over Time and Leads to Significant Health Issues

Whereas acute stress is temporary, chronic stress is ongoing. Chronic stress typically arises from continued exposure to unreachable stressors-for instance, being poor, caregiving responsibilities, and an adverse work environment. Unlike acute stress, which has an on/off nature, chronic stress grinds down the human body and mind over time by promoting serious health consequences (American Psychological Association, 2018).

For example, a single parent who cannot find the balance between working full-time and babysitting may suffer from chronic stress due to constant time pressures, lack of finances, and lack of help. After weeks, months, or even years, this can eventually cause sleep disturbances, anxiety disorders, and depression (Arumugam, n.d.). Physically, chronic stress is implicated in illnesses such as high blood pressure, digestive disorders, and a weakened immune system in which the body remains permanently on its toes, interfering with normal functioning.

A typical example of real life comes from the family members serving their chronically ill loved one. Research shows that taking good care of them, over time, regularly raises the level of cortisol and, if prolonged may result in memory problems, cardiovascular issues, and even reduce life expectation (Schulz and Eden, 2019). Therefore, chronic stress is not merely a mental challenge but a serious physical one, which needs to be managed over the long term.

Stressors of Modern Life

Contemporary life has brought forward a number of stressors that heighten the incidences of both acute and chronic stress. The shape of these triggers has come from changes in society, technology, and culture to remodel how people live, work, and relate to one another (Chong, 2017).

Figure 2 Stressors of Modern Life

Workplace Pressures

The contemporary workplace has turned into a source of major stress, with demands on employees being heavy, time limits pressing, and a loss of a job being a threat. The demand to be “on” all the time has erased the boundaries between professional and personal life. Hence, people burn out and show dissatisfaction. For instance, a corporate employee may start a day with continuous meetings, juggle high-priority projects, and end the day with answering emails in the late hours of the night.

This relentless pace leaves little room for recuperation, increasing the likelihood of chronic stress and related illnesses.

Most poignantly, the crisis faced by healthcare professionals, mainly during tragedies like a COVID-19 pandemic, epitomizes this scenario. Doctors and nurses work very often for extended, exhausting hours, are exposed to the psychological pressures of being near seriously sick patients, and they live in fear of making humiliating mistakes that will change the course of lives forever. Such environmental circumstances give rise to acute stressor events in the short run and chronic stressors over a long period of time, leading to a certain degree of burnout and loss of many professionals from the field (Google Books, 2021).

Digital Overload

Proliferation of technology has transformed communication and productivity but concurrently provided a source of unique modern stressors (Singh et al., 2022). In this respect, the 24/7 connectivity brought about by smartphones and laptops provides a continuing flow of notifications, emails, and updates. It is very hard to disconnect in that setting. Overload in the digital world does not only affect work-life balance but also fosters feelings of inadequacy and social isolation, especially through social networking.

For instance, consider a young professional who has just finished a very long day at work and then spends hours browsing through Instagram. What was supposed to be a relaxed way to end the evening quickly becomes an endless comparing of the self to curated images of other people’s lives, multiplying feelings of stress and dissatisfaction. In time, such a spiral feeds chronic stress, as one struggles to meet expectations at work or in life.

Societal Expectations

Add to this societal norms and expectations that further increase the level of stress, especially in conforming to ideals of career success, relationship success, and physical appearance. The pressure to “have it all” can create overwhelming stress, especially for people when those ideals seem unreachable. For instance, single parents do face unique challenges in that respect (Proquest.com, 2022). Trying to juggle the demands of parenting with those of a full-time career leaves very little time for self-care-it is a never-ending vicious circle of stress. A single mother in retail might be concerned about providing for her children financially, yet at times she may also feel guilty about not being able to spend good quality time with her children. In addition to daily tasks, societal pressures add to the stress.

Examples: A Day in the Life of People Undergoing Modern Stress

1. Corporate Employee: A mid-level manager may start their day with early-morning emails, followed by hours of meetings and project deadlines. Even when these have been achieved, one is often compelled to continue answering messages deep into the night, which only leaves them fatigued and irritable. This eventual schedule ensures any burnout.
2. Medical Professional: A nurse works a 12-hour shift in an understaffed hospital and attends to critically ill patients. The acute stress is brought forth by the constant decision-making, emotional strain, and fear of mistakes. When combined with long-term challenges like insufficient sleep and personal responsibilities, it leads to chronic stress.
3. Single Parent: A mother runs her home, gets the children ready to go to school, and goes to a full-time job. The evening is completed with homework and household chores. Added to this are money worries and the loss of personal time that continues to push her level of stress higher and higher to unhealthy levels.

Modern stress is not just a personal issue—it is deeply intertwined with societal systems and technological advancements. Understanding its triggers and nuances is essential for developing strategies to mitigate its impact and foster healthier, more balanced lives.

The Psychological and Physical Toll of Stress

Mental Health Consequences

The underlying effect of stress on mental health is commonly expressed in the forms of anxiety, depression, and burnout. Anxiety represents one of the most prevalent reactions when people go through prolonged stress. Anxiety encompasses excessive worry, fear, and unease. Such anxiety, caused by academic pressure or workplace demands, may surge into generalized anxiety disorder when it is not taken care of, or in other words, unmanaged. Likewise, depression usually emerges when chronic stress has interfered with brain chemistry, and moods change toward sadness, hopelessness, and disconnection. Burnout refers to a state of emotional, physical, and mental exhaustion following one’s exposure to an environment characterized by high levels of stress (Sun et al., 2022).

For instance, when a college student has to manage academic deadlines with part-time work and personal demands, he might suffer from anxiety with symptoms of burnout. He can become further affected in sleep disturbances, poor performance at work and studies, or withdrawal from social interactions. Such examples point out how stress causes a mental imbalance and reinforces the call for timely interventions.

Physical Health Consequences

Chronic stress in particular exacts a large toll on physiological health. Long-term stress is associated with cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension and heart disease, since high levels of cortisol stress the heart and blood vessels. Stress suppresses the immune system, thereby leaving individuals more vulnerable to illness and disease. Long-term conditions, including diabetes and gastrointestinal disorders, have also been linked to chronic stress (Franklin et al., 2021).

For instance, it has been determined through studies that workers in stressful jobs, like stockbrokers, have the tendency to acquire irritability-generated hypertension because they need to make quick decisions under time pressure always. The physical consequences of stress also suggest that active management strategies need to be developed to minimize the risk of potential health problems later in life.

De-escalating the Stress Cycle: Relief and Resilience Strategies

Mindfulness and Emotional Regulation

Meditation, journaling, and other forms of mindfulness are great tools for dealing with stress. Meditation helps to focus and calm the mind, allows one to disengage from stressful stimuli, and reset their emotional state. Journaling provides a reflective outlet to process emotions while breathing exercises can immediately reduce tension (Mayo Clinic Staff, 2023).

Figure 3 Stress Cycle

Among multinationals, as part of the workplace mindfulness program, it has been reported that employee burnout has decreased by 25% (Huang, Tu and Xie, 2024). Participants in the program reported enhanced concentration, improved emotional regulation, and reduced their stress levels, thus depicting practical benefits in relation to mindfulness techniques.

Building Resilience

Resilience is the ability to adapt positively to adversity and to recover from setbacks. The supportive relationships and work-life balance are part of resilience. Building a strong support system of friends and family would help decrease feelings of isolation and being understood (Sutton, 2019).

For instance, having to balance professional and personal demands, one of the working parents mentioned that managing stress through flexible work policies is important. Moreover, access to work arrangements like remote work allowed him to devote time to family well and, therefore, not compromise on career objectives. His case represents how resilience-building strategies allow the attainment of balance or, rather, equilibrium.

The Role of Technology

Technology is thus the source of solutions and problems in managing stress. Applications that help track stress, like Calm and Headspace, make tools for relaxation and emotional support more available (Anthoula-Ioanna Kritikou, Myrto-Evangelia Nikolaidi and Chavianidis, 2024). Online therapy platforms, on the other hand, provide a link with professional services, increasing access to care. At the same time, digital addiction can take forms of constant scrolling or compulsive use of apps, adding to stress by creating an overwhelmed sense of notifications and social comparisons. It is necessary to balance the use of technology for any benefit in well-being, keeping negative impacts at a minimum, in order to break the cycle of stress.

The Social Consequences of Stress

Stress is decidedly more than a personal issue; it also carries considerable social repercussions that reverberate in families, workplaces, communities, and even entire nations. At the same time, while individuals suffer most directly from the effects of stress on their mental and physical health, its broader social implications are very important and run the gamut from economic productivity and civic health to social coherence. A collective approach, therefore, becomes critical in dealing with stress for developing healthier and stronger communities (Couch and Coles, 2011).

The Economic Burden of Stress

Stress-related diseases are a big economic drain on the world’s healthcare. Diseases such as heart diseases, anxiety disorders, and depression, many of which are triggered or worsened by chronic stress, are very costly to treat medically through hospitalization, therapy, or medication. Research has indicated that workplace stress alone costs billions of dollars annually in health care, owing to cases of hypertension, insomnia, and mental health crises. The workplace is a very critical area where the economic burden of stress is especially evident. Employees experiencing high-stress environments will often become burned out, sometimes leading to absenteeism, low engagement, and decreased productivity levels. This disengagement causes huge losses for organizations, including some estimates declaring that 50-60% of workplace absenteeism is caused by stress-related issues (Mariotti, 2015).

For example, a global financial firm recorded a 15% loss in productivity following the implementation of unrealistic performance goals as proof of the debilitating effect of stress on organizational effectiveness (Satpathy et al., n.d.). Consequently, dealing with workplace stress is not solely an employee well-being concern but an economic imperative.

Stress and Community

Well-being It can drain the social fabric and community resilience-especially from the high-stress environment of low-income neighbourhoods or high-crime urban areas. The daily life stress coming out of such environments originates from financial insecurity, exposure to violence, and poor access to mental health resources. If left unmanaged, anxiety and depression are prevailing negative effects on mental status due to chronic stressors, which further weaken networks of social relationships, entrenching self-reinforcing cycles of instability (Setiawan and Ningtyas, 2023).

A strong example of de-stressing on a communal-wide level was an urban initiative launched through a very high-crime area. Recognizing the connection between chronic stress and social decay, local leaders initiated a city-wide program that offered mindfulness workshops throughout the city, provided support groups, and made mental health services available. The result was significantly reduced levels of stress among residents, better mental health outcomes, and more tightly-knit community relationships. They reported feeling more connected and supported, underscoring the place of collective efforts in fighting stress.

Proactive Ways to Handle Stress

To decrease the negative social outcomes of stress, proactive approaches should be in place through government, organizations, and society (Bird et al., 2020). Policies that make mental health care accessible, community-based programs, and therapy on demand-all this should have funding. Likewise, within the workplace, conditions promoting stress can be alleviated by offering flexible working hours, an employee assistance program, and wellness on-site activities. Community-focused initiatives also bear much fruit. For example, neighborhood support groups or mindfulness workshops organized at the local community center will help arm recipients with ways to manage stress while fostering a sense of community. Schools, too, can ensure that techniques in stress management are integrated into curricula, thus equipping young people throughout their lives with ways to deal with stress effectively.

The Path to a Resilient Society

Less stress at the societal level will have long-term benefits, ranging from reduced health costs to stronger and more cohesive communities (Wilkinson, 2020). By addressing the social aspects of stress, societies can develop a setting where people will feel cared for and appreciated, thereby driving community well-being to new heights. It is incumbent upon governments, organizations, and the community to work together toward that goal of reduction of stress, and this needs to be underlined-that a healthier society begins with the addressing of those pressures weighing upon its citizens. This holistic approach alleviates not only the individual toll of stress but strengthens the social fabric for a more resilient prosperous future.

Conclusion: Towards a Stress-Resilient Society

Stress, besides being a part of life, also has consequences at wider individual and social levels. The psychological, physical, and social dimensions of the consequences are an urgent call to face stress with lightened strategies and proactive interventions. Individually, this would enable people to cope with stress by increasing their mindfulness, building resilience, and providing them with tools that empower them through technology. Society-wide, workplace policy, community programs, and access to mental health services could promote a collective sense of well-being.

In building a society resistant to stress, the multifaceted nature of stress has to be brought into awareness, with cultural change toward mental health and work-life balance. “Governments, organizations, and communities must come together to mitigate pressures that weigh individuals down and weaken the social glue.” An all-rounded approach in addressing stress is a sure way of improving personal well-being at the same time as strengthening the building blocks of a healthier, richer world where individuals and communities can thrive.

References

American Psychological Association (2018). Stress effects on the body. [online] American Psychological Association. Available at: https://www.apa.org/topics/stress/body.

Anthoula-Ioanna Kritikou, Myrto-Evangelia Nikolaidi and Chavianidis, T. (2024). The role of mobile applications in managing everyday stress through breathing. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, [online] Volume 20(Issue 1), pp.283–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.20.1.0242.

Arumugam, V. (n.d.). The Effects of Stress On Single Mothers’ Work-Life Balance. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.2015/IJIRMF/202304036.

Bird, W., Adamo, G., Pitini, E., Gray, M. and Jani, A. (2020). Reducing chronic stress to promote health in adults: the role of social prescriptions and social movements. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 113(3), pp.105–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076819890547.

Budziszewska, M.D., Babiuch-Hall, M. and Wielebska, K. (2020). Love and Romantic Relationships in the Voices of Patients Who Experience Psychosis: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570928.

Chong, J. (2017). 5 reasons why modern life causes stress (and what to do about it). [online] The Skill Collective. Available at: https://theskillcollective.com/blog/modern-life-causes-stress.

Couch, S.R. and Coles, C.J. (2011). Community Stress, Psychosocial Hazards, and EPA Decision-Making in Communities Impacted by Chronic Technological Disasters. American Journal of Public Health, [online] 101(Suppl 1), pp.S140–S148. doi:https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.300039.

Dhabhar, F.S. (2018). The short-term stress response – Mother nature’s mechanism for enhancing protection and performance under conditions of threat, challenge, and opportunity. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, [online] 49(PMC5964013), pp.175–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.004.

Epel, E.S., Crosswell, A.D., Mayer, S.E., Prather, A.A., Slavich, G.M., Puterman, E. and Mendes, W.B. (2018). More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, [online] 49(1), pp.146–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001.

Franklin, B.A., Rusia, A., Haskin-Popp, C. and Tawney, A. (2021). Chronic Stress, Exercise and Cardiovascular Disease: Placing the Benefits and Risks of Physical Activity into Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 18(18), p.9922. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189922.

Google Books. (2021). Managing and Preventing Pandemics. [online] Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=vgQcEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP10&dq=Most+poignantly [Accessed 25 Nov. 2024].

Huang, C.-C., Tu, Y. and Xie, X. (2024). Mindfulness and job performance in employees of a multinational corporation: Moderated mediation of nationality, intercultural communication, and burnout. Social sciences & humanities open, 10, pp.100975–100975. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100975.

Knezevic, E., Katarina Nenic, Milanovic, V. and Nebojsa Nick Knezevic (2023). The Role of Cortisol in Chronic Stress, Neurodegenerative Diseases, and Psychological Disorders. Cells, [online] 12(23), pp.2726–2726. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12232726.

Mariotti, A. (2015). The effects of chronic stress on health: new insights into the molecular mechanisms of brain–body communication. Future Science OA, [online] 1(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.4155/fso.15.21.

Mayo Clinic Staff (2023). Meditation: A simple, fast way to reduce stress. [online] Mayo Clinic. Available at: https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/meditation/in-depth/meditation/art-20045858.

Milen, D. (n.d.). The Ability of Firefighting Personnel to Cope With Stress. Journal of Social Change, [online] 3, pp.38–56. Available at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=jsc.

Proquest.com. (2022). The Pressures Working Moms Face Performing in their Careers and their Homes: Creating and Fostering Resiliency in a Social Media Saturated Society – ProQuest. [online] Available at: https://search.proquest.com/openview/987b0108c7a84a7e1aeef81e267c9426/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y [Accessed 25 Nov. 2024].

Satpathy, S., Cvetkoska, V., Patel, Gokulananda and Patel, G. (n.d.). The Impact of Organizational Stress on Financial Performance: Evidence from Software Development Companies. [online] Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/283684/1/1797603906.pdf [Accessed 25 Nov. 2024].

Schulz, R. and Eden, J. (2019). Family Caregiving Roles and Impacts. [online] National Library of Medicine. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK396398/.

Setiawan, C.T. and Ningtyas, R. (2023). Urban Well-Being and Community Development: Investigating the Relationship Between Built Environments, Social Networks, and Quality of Life. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, [online] 1(02), pp.53–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v1i02.188.

Singh, P., Bala, H., Dey, B.L. and Filieri, R. (2022). Enforced Remote working: the Impact of Digital platform-induced Stress and Remote Working Experience on Technology Exhaustion and Subjective Wellbeing. Journal of Business Research, 151(1), pp.269–286.

Sun, J., Sarfraz, M., Ivascu, L., Iqbal, K. and Mansoor, A. (2022). How Did Work-Related Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Hamper Healthcare Employee Performance during COVID-19? The Mediating Role of Job Burnout and Mental Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 19(16), p.10359. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610359.

Sutton, J. (2019). What is resilience and why is it important to bounce back? [online] PositivePsychology. Available at: https://positivepsychology.com/what-is-resilience/.

Wilkinson, R.G. (2020). Income Inequality, Social Cohesion, and Health: Clarifying the Theory— A Reply to Muntaner and Lynch. Routledge eBooks, pp.347–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315231051-21.