Social Relationships and Health

Social relationships indeed are a major determinant of health, in turn influencing physical and mental health to a great extent (Umberson and Karas Montez, 2020). People with good social support have been found to be at lower risks of active non-communicable diseases, having a better immune system and longer expectancy of life. Whereas, on the other hand, social isolation and loneliness have always been interlinked with adverse outcomes in health, which comprises of heightened vulnerability to cardiovascular disease, higher rates of depression, and early mortality.

In today’s society, rapid urbanization, technological changes, and changing family structures all seem to have rewritten the way in which people interact with one another (Martino, Pegg and Frates, 2017). Digital connectivity provides new avenues of reaching out and maintaining contact, yet too often without depth or quality compared to face-to-face contact, exacerbating perceptions of loneliness. The COVID-19 pandemic brought this into real perspective, as mandated lockdowns and social distancing policies accelerated social isolation and underlined in harsh terms how protective relationships are for health (Schneiders, Mackworth-Young and Cheah, 2022).

There is increasing recognition of social relationships as one of the priorities in health concern amidst evolving public health concerns. The important development of health policies and interventions that foster meaningful social connections could be important in improving population health and taking on the rising tide of loneliness and isolation.

The Biological Mechanisms of Social Relationships

Physiological Effects: Immune System and Cardiovascular Health

Notably, social relationship quantity and quality have a quintessential physiological consequence, especially on immune function and cardiovascular health (Lauten, Natour and Case, 2024). According to studies, supportive relationships are considered apt to control the body’s response to stress. This, in turn, has an afterward positive effect on the working of the immune system. Positive social contacts lead to the secretion of oxytocin, also called the “bonding hormone,” which reduces stress and strengthens the immune system. Furthermore, it is seen that individuals with social support networks are found to produce higher antibody responses to vaccinations and to have greater resistance to infections. On the other hand, in the case of social isolation, a hyperactive stress response is solemnly induced. The resultant chronic inflammation and undermined immune defense have resulted in ever-increasing susceptibility to diseases like hypertension and autoimmune disorders.

The cardiovascular system also benefits greatly from social support. Indeed, research has documented that socially connected individuals have lower blood pressure and a reduced risk of cardiovascular problems. Conversely, low levels of social relationships are associated with higher blood pressure and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, including fatal or nonfatal strokes, where the cardiovascular effects of chronic social isolation bear some resemblance to major risk factors such as smoking and obesity.

Indeed, loneliness increases one’s risk for heart disease by 29 percent and stroke by 32 percent, as one study showed (Xia and Li, 2018). It is clear, therefore, that positive or negative social relationships have a strong relation to long-term cardiovascular health.

Psychological Theories: Maslow’s Hierarchy and Attachment Theory

These psychological theories may try to explain why such social relationships have become so fundamental to health and well-being.

Social relationships, according to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, fulfill the third level of human needs: belongingness and love. Once physiological and safety needs are satisfied, a further need for social belonging created in one’s self-esteem and way of actualizing becomes very important. Social relationships fulfill this need, wherein individuals feel valued, supported, and understood, all of which avail in creating emotional stability and strength. For example, people who report that they have relationships with close friends tend to show less anxiety and depression and are more likely to report higher life satisfaction (Bowen, 2021).

Attachment theory, suggested by psychologist John Bowlby, underlines how these early social bonds set the stage for later emotional health. A good attachment established during childhood provides a secure base from which one can develop appropriate mechanisms for coping with adverse conditions and regulating one’s emotions. One can easily predict that adults who have secure attachments with others are more likely to establish supportive relations whereas the one who has insecure attachment may differ in relationships and stand-alone that may result in loneliness and Lost health (MacBlain, 2021). For example, generally, adults with insecure childhood attachments show more social anxiety and more cortisol when they are confronted with social situations which could count toward chronic stress and result in health problems (Kidd, Hamer and Steptoe, 2013). These intertwined biological and psychological mechanisms now underscore how important social relationships serve in maintaining health, shaping responses to stress, connecting with others, and sustaining mental and physical well-being.

Health Benefits of Social Relationships

Physical Health: Implications for the Development of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer Survival

Social relationships are beneficial to physical health on the whole, in cardiovascular health, and in cancer survival. Various studies have underlined that participants with large-sized social support networks have considerably lower mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular disease. Supportive relationships reduce levels of stress, lower blood pressure, and improve heart functioning. Studies have shown that married individuals or those with a close, long-term relationship have up to a 12% lower risk of developing heart disease than single individuals or those without such relationships (American College of Cardiology, n.d.). Such an effect partially can be explained by buffering from emotional support, as stress has been widely accepted to be one of the major contributors to heart diseases.

Social ties also play a very important role in fostering improved survival rates from cancer. Research has documented that patients with advanced cancer who have more social support have higher survival rates and respond better to their treatment (Bou‐Samra et al., 2021). The presence of close friends and family may encourage patients to comply with treatment plans, come in for follow-up care, and to engage in health-promoting behaviors. For example, breast cancer patients who were more actively involved in their support groups reported a better quality of life and immune functioning than patients who were socially isolated. Although social support-especially-fosters resilience and optimism that are psychologically beneficial and possibly reduce inflammation markers linked to cancer progression, social relationships help buffer psychologically and facilitate health-enhancing behaviors crucial for cancer survival and recovery.

Mental Health: Its Role in Trying to Reduce Depression and Stress

Mental Health: Its Role in Trying to Reduce Depression PTSD Symptoms, and Stress Social connections play an equally protecting role in maintaining mental health, greatly reducing the risks of depression, PTSD, and stress (Jones, Mougouei and Evans, 2021). Quality relationships thus offer emotional support, validation, and a feeling of belonging-all protective factors for depression. For example, it has been shown that individuals with solid social networks are up to 50% less likely to develop depressive symptoms. Socialization helps individuals reframe negative thinking, enjoy activities, and stay involved with a purpose in life-all factors that are counter-depressive. For example, older adults who experience frequent family and friend contact have less depressive symptoms and greater happiness than do reclusive elderly people. This speaks to the importance of social connection with regard to maintaining mental health across the years. Quality in social relationships in PTSD serves as a shock-absorbing mechanism that allows the individual to work through traumatic experiences. Individuals suffering from the illness who are found to have more supportive relationships generally express lower levels of clinical symptoms-intrusive memories and hyperarousal-compared to others. The networks allow them a chance to talk through events and to be understood and listened to with empathy; this can help them feel less isolated and afraid.

The study shows that the veterans who are socially well-supported have a higher chance of positive change in psychological outlook after trauma, otherwise known as post-traumatic growth, rather than feelings of isolation. These findings will go toward the therapeutic power of social connections with regard to trauma recovery and strategies that reduce symptoms of PTSD.

Another important impact of social support is the fact that it significantly reduces levels of stress by providing practical and emotional assistance during times of need. When people have an assured and sure support network, they cope with the given stressors. Friends, family, and colleagues can offer perspective advice and direct help in problem solving, which makes the burden of stress lighter. A good example is that people who have supportive networks due to stress attributable to job loss generally report lower levels of stress and faster recovery.

The buffering hypothesis proposes that a given level of stress will have much less impact on individuals’ mental and physical health if they feel there are people to whom they can turn for support. It may even be taken onto a physiological level, whereby even the presence of support reduces cortisol levels-those becoming too high may lead to chronic health problems. The bottom line: social relationships powerfully affect both physical and mental health. By acting on heart disease, cancer survival, depression, PTSD, and stress management-in all these ways-supportive relationships act protectively against a wide array of health risks. These examples point to the broad-based benefits of social connection, underlining their association not just with quality of life but with the length of life itself (Jones, Mougouei and Evans, 2021).

Consequences of Social Isolation

Comparison with Other Health Risks: Smoking, Obesity

Social isolation and loneliness are increasingly viewed as major health risks, with some studies suggesting their impact on physical health may be just as profound as that of well-recognized risks such as smoking and obesity. For instance, studies have documented that long-term social isolation is associated with a 29% heightened risk of premature death, a number comparable to the mortality risk from smoking 15 cigarettes a day. Like smoking, social isolation can foster high blood pressure, inflammation, and the development of chronic conditions such as heart disease. Similar to the parallel consequences of social isolation, obesity is also attributed to increased inflammation and susceptibility to a wide array of health issues (Xia and Li, 2018b).

Both social isolation and obesity tend to put individuals at health risks by engaging them in activities that further deteriorate their health conditions. The isolated individual can be more inclined towards resigning themselves to sedentary life, eating poorly, and not seeing their physician regularly, all factors that worsen physical and mental problems. Further, loneliness can weaken the body’s immune system and leave an open door to disease. For example, researchers have documented that people with large social networks are less likely to develop a cold or other viral infections than averaging and poorly connected individuals, protection that the socially isolated do not enjoy. Such comparisons underscore the point that social isolation is an imposing physiological risk factor, one not limited to only being a psychological problem, but in fact ranking with many best-acknowledged health hazards.

Loneliness and Mortality Rates: A Critical Review

Loneliness largely features alongside social isolation and, on the whole, has very serious ramifications in terms of mortality rates. Large numbers of studies have, in fact, found chronic loneliness to be associated with increased mortality risks, which often rests at a level comparable to those of more established physical health hazards. A meta-analysis of several studies found that loneliness increases the risk of early death by about 26%, highlighting the magnitude of this issue (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015).

This increased risk of mortality is in part a function of how loneliness acts to affect stress and, subsequently, cardiovascular health. Indeed, prolonged states of loneliness are associated with increased levels of cortisol-a stress hormone that, at chronically elevated levels, contributes to high blood pressure, inflammation, and other cardiovascular conditions that increase mortality risk.

The influence of loneliness on mortality goes beyond cardiovascular health, as it has also been associated with increased risks of dementia and neurodegenerative conditions. Loneliness seems to hasten the decline in cognitive performance, likely because of the lack of mental challenge and social interaction to stimulate and support cognitive function. For example, studies of older adults under conditions of social isolation have reported accelerated declines in cognitive function, as well as increased susceptibility to illness, including Alzheimer’s disease, making loneliness a significant public health concern in older age. Loneliness has also contributed to other mental conditions such as depression and anxiety, which indirectly contribute to mortality. Such mental health problems may further lead to self-neglect, substance abuse, and suicide, which are all adding up to rates of untimely death.

A kind of snowball effect seems to appear between loneliness and mental health problems, inasmuch as loneliness heightens levels of mental health, which in turn heighten levels of loneliness and therefore further exacerbate physical health and life span. Therefore, the review of loneliness consequences will manifestly reveal that health risks due to social isolation are widespread and serious: loneliness increases mortality rates but decreases quality because it accelerates cognitive decline and contributes to mental health problems. Therefore, policy interventions, community initiatives, and mental health support for addressing social isolation may be necessary for mitigating such serious health risks and ensuring healthy longevity across the populations.

Social Support as Preventative Medicine

Case Studies of “Connection Prescription” Practices

A “Connection Prescription” is one way a conceptual model can be using social support to prevent health decline by directly reducing the isolation risk factor. Programs that do just this, that being integration of social connections into care, include the UK’s “Social Prescribing” initiative (Reinhardt, Vidovic and Hammerton, 2021).

Participants in this program, which serves individuals with chronic health conditions or mental health problems, receive “prescriptions” for community activities  that are encouraging interaction and lessening loneliness. Researchers described improved mental well-being for participants-studies of the participants have reproduced findings of reduced GP visits and improved overall health outcomes-suggesting that promoting social interaction may divorce symptoms related to both mental and physical health conditions.

Similarly, “Connection Prescription” practices have been put in place by some U.S. healthcare providers in major primary care settings. Physicians refer their patients to activities that nurture social bonding through club memberships, volunteer work, and the like. These programs have been particularly efficient among older adults, where loneliness and related isolation are more current features. The outcomes from these initiatives have shown reductions in anxiety, depression, and chronic pain, again pinpointing that social support is indeed another strong, non-pharmacological intervention.

Role in Lifestyle Medicine and Health Interventions

Social support forms a very important part of lifestyle medicine, which is preventive and holistic. Indeed, social connection has recently emerged as a critical component of lifestyle intervention. For instance, behavioral modification programs for various diseases like obesity, diabetes, or heart disease have group-based efforts where support among peers motivates participants by enhancing their adherence to prescribed healthy behaviors. This approach benefits not just in better individual outcomes but also leads to sustained lifestyle changes. The practice of social prescription and support interventions for the meeting of social needs in health shows how relational nurturing between people can act as powerful, preventive medicine. Both processes suggest that community ties should be at the heart of public health strategies and approaches to healthcare in dealing with chronic diseases and psychological health.

Impact of Modern Society on Social Relationships

Digital Communication versus Face-to-Face Interaction

Social relationships in contemporary times are actually technologically mediated; thus, the very nature of human connectedness has changed. To be sure, digital communication is convenient and can even bridge distances, yet so much of it is devoid of the depth and emotional richness that face-to-face interaction provides. And at times, such virtual communication can only lead to a superficial connect in which one misses the non-verbal hints and substantial engagement at levels quite necessary to foster an atmosphere of trust and empathy. Other studies found that digital dependence, such as in the case of excessive use of social media, may result in an increased feeling of loneliness despite a growing quantity of social contacts. This may therefore form a paradox in which the advance in technology potentially thwarts the development of genuinely supportive relationships.

Urbanization and Changing Family Structure

Changes in family structure and urbanization have also transformed social relationships, and more often than not, a sense of disconnection. Apart from urbanization, people may be living in areas of high population but solitude due to rapid lifestyles, reduced personal contacts, and increased single-person households. Secondly, conventional family structures are changing, even more so within the persons who live alone or non-traditionally, hence reducing the support derived from closely related families (Hussain, 2023).

These changes in society have resulted in many of today’s individuals relying more on friendships and external networks for support, which may not be as reliable or emotionally as deep or have the depth provided by family connections. While modern society offers new ways to connect, it brings with it serious challenges in making and maintaining meaningful relationships, thus underlining the need for conscious efforts towards evolving genuine social bonding.

Conclusion

In sum, social relationships bear much importance, not only in terms of mental and emotional health but also physical health, as they strongly affect life expectancy and quality. Since our world is being increasingly set up for digital and urban living, authentic deep contacts have been progressively hard to uphold, which is a reason that makes it even more necessary that social health be made part of public health concerns. Policies that encourage community building and social prescribing, along with balanced digital interactions, can go a long way in mitigating adverse health effects related to loneliness and social isolation. It is for this reason that policy recognition of social support as preventive medicine-especially for mental and chronic health conditions-becomes quite instrumental toward future public health strategies. Indeed, generating healthy social networks at the community level provides a long-term and holistic solution to general health and longevity.

References

American College of Cardiology. (n.d.). Marriage Linked to Lower Heart Risks in Study of 3.5+ Million Adults. [online] Available at: https://www.acc.org/about-acc/press-releases/2014/03/28/09/55/alviar-marital-status.

Bou‐Samra, P., Scott, P., Cheng, H., Kallem, C., Pathak, R., Geller, D.A., Marsh, W., Wang, Y., Antoni, M., Penedo, F.J., Tsung, A. and Steel, J.L. (2021). Social Support is Associated with Survival in Patients Diagnosed with Gastrointestinal Cancer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 53(4), pp.854–861. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-021-00741-8.

Bowen, B. (2021). The matrix of needs: reframing Maslow’s hierarchy. Health, [online] 13(05), pp.538–563. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2021.135041.

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T., Baker, M., Harris, T. and Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: a Meta-Analytic Review. [online] Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25910392/.

Hussain, M. (2023). Urbanization and Its Effects on Social Structures: A Social Science Inquiry. Physical Education, Health and Social Sciences, [online] 1(4), pp.31–40. Available at: http://journal-of-social-education.org/index.php/Jorunal/article/view/46 [Accessed 17 Nov. 2024].

Jones, R., Mougouei, D. and Evans, S.L. (2021). Understanding the emotional response to Covid‐19 information in news and social media: A mental health perspective. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(5). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.304.

Kidd, T., Hamer, M. and Steptoe, A. (2013). Adult attachment style and cortisol responses across the day in older adults. Psychophysiology, 50(9), pp.841–847. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12075.

Lauten, T.H., Natour, T. and Case, A.J. (2024). Innate and adaptive immune system consequences of post-traumatic stress disorder. Autonomic Neuroscience, 252, pp.103159–103159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2024.103159.

MacBlain, S. (2021). Learning Theories for Early Years Practice. www.torrossa.com, [online] pp.1–100. Available at: https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5282231&publisher=FZ7200#page=87.

Martino, J., Pegg, J. and Frates, E.P. (2017). The Connection Prescription: Using the Power of Social Interactions and the Deep Desire for Connectedness to Empower Health and Wellness. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, [online] 11(6), pp.466–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827615608788.

Reinhardt, G., Vidovic, D. and Hammerton, C. (2021). Understanding loneliness: a systematic review of the impact of social prescribing initiatives on loneliness. Perspectives in Public Health, [online] 141(4), pp.204–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913920967040.

Schneiders, M.L., Mackworth-Young, C.R.S. and Cheah, P.Y. (2022). Between division and connection: a qualitative study of the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on social relationships in the United Kingdom. Wellcome Open Research, 7, p.6. doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17452.1.

Umberson, D. and Karas Montez, J. (2020). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, [online] 51(1), pp.54–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383501.

Xia, N. and Li, H. (2018a). Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Cardiovascular Health. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, [online] 28(9), pp.837–851. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2017.7312.

Xia, N. and Li, H. (2018b). Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Cardiovascular Health. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, [online] 28(9), pp.837–851. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2017.7312.

Disclaimer:

At Medikiaa Health Publishing, we offer our readers access to a collection of archived materials. Please be sure to check the date of the last review or update for each article. Remember, the information on this site, no matter how recent, should never replace the personalized medical advice from your doctor or another qualified healthcare professional.